|
The Westerly Owners' Association - Definitive Guides
The Regattas
(First published in WOA magazine No. 67, Winter
2001)
There were 5 Regattas. The little Spirit, which
itself came from an altered and shortened Griffon mould, became
the 260 in late 1993. The recently lengthened and improved Merlin
evolved into the 290 at the same time. The Tempest gave way to the
310 by the end of the same year. The Storm emerged as the 330 at
the same time as the 310. Last of all the 370 grew from my favourite
Typhoon at the beginning of 1994.
For some time the Westerly range had been pulling
in two directions, with the fast Storms, Typhoons and Tempests seeming
at odds with the very cruisey Ocean Rangers, Quests and Lords. In
the early 90s, the Company was just reforming itself from bankruptcy
and needed to have something new to claw back some of the attention
and sales that had been going Moodys way since the turn of
the decade.
There was no money to do anything dramatic, of
course, so no new boats could be developed (it costs at least half
a million to bring on a truly new yacht). Which is why the idea
of making a whole new range out of existing boats was so exciting.
The Regattas would capitalise on the fast image
of the Storms that had been such a success in the late 80s, while
the Oceans would carry forward the proud tradition of generations
of Westerly cruising boats. But how to make the marketing hype seem
more real? At least one of the new ranges must be really new, not
just re-badged.
There being so little money to spare, the Oceans
were more or less left to their own devices, the odd tweak excepted,
apart from strengthening the Ocean name. This allowed the Regattas
to be given the full treatment with totally new interiors, designed
by famous boat interior designer Ken Freivokh. And the full treatment
is exactly what they got.
Kens expertise went far further than the
avant garde appearance, by adding design updatings of real worth.
The sleeping and living areas were made to look and feel as separate
as they are in reality, a strong departure from the homogenisation
of the usual boat interior, where everything matches everything
else. The simple part of this transformation was achieved by covering
the bunk cushions in mattress ticking (though dedicated followers
of fashion would call it something much more elegant). The subtler
changes were seen in such details as the curve to the forepeak double
in the 290 and 310 - so much more elegant that the usual Vee.
When aft toilets were first introduced, saloons
moved forward. In bigger boats this presents no problem as they
have enough beam to allow parallel straight settees. That allows
lots of people to sit chatting in the saloon, whether drinking or
eating, with just enough room behind them for decent stowage. In
smaller boats, this approach leaves the saloon settees perilously
narrow at the front end, and with precious little space left over
for stowage. (For the height of discomfort, try a Merlin saloon).
All the best ideas are so ridiculously simple,
that we all wonder why no-one ever thought of them before. Mr. Freivokhs
answer was to abandon the parallel look altogether. This involved
ditching the oblong table and replacing it with a Vee shaped one.
At first sight - no use whatsoever as people at the pointy end have
nowhere to put anything. BUT... if you use the Vee as a central
feature, and hang a decent oblong flap on either side - bingo! theres
plenty of room for place settings on the oblongs. Also, the Vee
can be played with to provide a boat shaped table, with wide stern
and long pointed bow - fast and sexy. Further, the back end of the
table is now much wider as well as better looking, and can have
a big round booze locker. Beginning to like the idea now are we?!
So we now have berths of even width, comfortable
to sit on and with better stowage behind. Leaving the aft end of
our new berths attached to straight bulkheads would restrict the
length, so here comes the next cunning twist. The front end of both
galley and chart table can be lengthened, and therefore enlarged,
by angling the bulkheads to give them a swept back look which adds
to the general air of curvy modernity.
Add in hemispherical sinks (why did we put up
with flat bottomed sinks in sailing boats?). Add in raised chart
table lockers (allowing the table surface to be much bigger - surely
everyones ideal). Add in a big squashy chart table seat with
PVC covers and curved squashy seat backs (why perch on a cloth seat
in wet oilies when you can be embraced in luxury?).
Im sure that one can find lots more clever
little improvements. It would be good to have a comment from Ken
himself. The overall impression is so amazingly different that it
is scarcely believable that, under the skin, these are Spirits,
Merlins, Tempests, Storms and Typhoons. A transformation indeed.
So why were these boats such a total failure,
in commercial terms? Probably, the changes were just too much to
take in. That was certainly my own feeling. Boat interiors had all
looked the same since the last time Westerly took a big step forward
in the late 70s, with the GK29s and Konsorts leading in to the look
of the 80s and 90s followed by almost every boat built in Britain
since. So many of us had been looking down our noses at the stark
Beneteau interiors, that we could not see Kens ideas as anything
more than a mistaken leap in that dreadful direction.
In fact, and with hindsight, these are wonderful
designs, with more interesting colours, new woods, more curves,
more comfort, better stowage, better galleys, better chart tables
and a fresh, bright, light and truly interesting look. One persons
breath of fresh air may be anothers draught, but as fresh
air types, living in a modern world, buying new design in every
other walk of life, isnt it time we gave these super boats
a second look?
|